Skip to main content

AHA 2026 Schema for Acute Pulmonary Embolism


Assessment of Pulmonary Embolism (PE)

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition requiring rapid, structured, and guideline-directed evaluation. Early risk stratification determines urgency of imaging, need for thrombolysis, and level of care.

This post summarizes a practical, ESC-aligned approach to assessment of PE.


1. Clinical Suspicion

Always think of PE in patients with:

  • Acute unexplained dyspnea
  • Pleuritic chest pain
  • Hemoptysis
  • Syncope
  • Unexplained tachycardia
  • New hypoxia

Risk Factors

  • Recent surgery or immobilization
  • Active cancer
  • Previous VTE
  • Pregnancy/postpartum
  • OCP use
  • Thrombophilia
  • Obesity

2. Hemodynamic Assessment (First Step)

Immediately determine if the patient is:

A. Hemodynamically Unstable (High-Risk PE)

  • SBP <90 mmHg
  • Drop in SBP ≥40 mmHg
  • Shock or cardiac arrest

Urgent bedside echocardiography → If RV dysfunction present → treat as high-risk PE (consider thrombolysis)


3. Clinical Probability Assessment

Use validated scoring systems.

Wells Score for PE

  • Clinical signs of DVT – 3
  • PE most likely diagnosis – 3
  • HR >100 – 1.5
  • Immobilization/surgery – 1.5
  • Previous VTE – 1.5
  • Hemoptysis – 1
  • Cancer – 1

Interpretation:

  • ≤4 → PE unlikely
  • 4 → PE likely


Revised Geneva Score

Objective alternative without subjective component.


4. D-Dimer Testing

  • Use only in low or intermediate probability
  • Age-adjusted cutoff:
    Age × 10 (if age >50)

If negative → PE excluded
If positive → proceed to imaging


5. Imaging Modalities

CT Pulmonary Angiography (CTPA) – Gold Standard

  • Direct visualization of intraluminal filling defect
  • Assesses clot burden
  • Evaluates RV size

Ventilation–Perfusion (V/Q) Scan

  • Useful in renal failure
  • Pregnancy
  • Contrast allergy

Compression Ultrasound

  • If proximal DVT present → treat as PE (if imaging unavailable)

6. ECG in PE

Common findings:

  • Sinus tachycardia (most common)
  • S1Q3T3 pattern
  • T-wave inversion V1–V4
  • RBBB

ECG is neither sensitive nor specific but helps risk stratification.


7. Echocardiography

Key findings:

  • RV dilation (RV/LV >1)
  • McConnell sign
  • D-shaped LV
  • Elevated pulmonary pressures

Echo is essential in unstable patients.


8. Biomarkers

  • Troponin → RV myocardial injury
  • BNP / NT-proBNP → RV strain

Positive biomarkers indicate worse prognosis.


9. Risk Stratification After Diagnosis

Using PESI / sPESI

  • Low risk → outpatient consideration
  • High risk → inpatient monitoring

ESC Risk Categories

Category Hemodynamics RV Dysfunction Troponin
High Risk Shock ± ±
Intermediate-High Stable + +
Intermediate-Low Stable +
Low Risk Stable

10. Stepwise Algorithm

  1. Assess hemodynamic status
  2. If unstable → bedside echo → urgent reperfusion
  3. If stable → assess clinical probability
  4. Low probability → D-dimer
  5. Positive D-dimer → CTPA
  6. After diagnosis → risk stratify (PESI + RV + biomarkers)

Key Clinical Pearls

  • Do not delay anticoagulation in high suspicion unless contraindicated
  • Age-adjusted D-dimer reduces unnecessary CT scans
  • Echo is a prognostic tool, not a rule-out test
  • Always reassess for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) if symptoms persist

Conclusion

Assessment of PE requires rapid clinical judgment combined with structured scoring systems, laboratory testing, and imaging. Early risk stratification determines prognosis and guides management decisions including thrombolysis and level of care.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brugada ECG vs Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (iRBBB)

Brugada ECG vs Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (iRBBB) Why this differentiation matters Brugada pattern is a malignant channelopathy associated with sudden cardiac death, while incomplete RBBB is usually a benign conduction variant. Mislabeling Brugada as iRBBB can be fatal; overcalling iRBBB as Brugada can lead to unnecessary anxiety and ICD implantation. --- 1. Basic Definitions Brugada ECG Pattern Primary repolarization abnormality Genetic sodium-channel disorder Characteristic ST-segment elevation in V1–V3 Risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden death Incomplete RBBB (iRBBB) Depolarization abnormality Delay in right ventricular conduction Common in healthy individuals Usually asymptomatic and benign --- 2. ECG Morphology: Side-by-Side Comparison QRS Duration Brugada: QRS usually <120 ms iRBBB: QRS <120 ms, but with RBBB morphology --- V1–V2 Pattern (Key Differentiator) Brugada Pseudo-RBBB appearance ST elevation ≥2 mm ST segment is coved or saddleback Terminal QRS bl...

Acute Treatment of Hyperkalemia

Acute Treatment of Hyperkalemia – A Practical, Bedside-Oriented Guide Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening electrolyte abnormality that demands prompt recognition and decisive management. The danger lies not only in the absolute potassium value but in its effects on cardiac conduction, which can rapidly progress to fatal arrhythmias. Acute treatment focuses on three parallel goals: stabilizing the cardiac membrane, shifting potassium into cells, and removing excess potassium from the body. Understanding this stepwise approach helps clinicians act quickly and rationally in emergency settings. Why Hyperkalemia Is Dangerous Potassium plays a key role in maintaining the resting membrane potential of cardiac myocytes. Elevated serum potassium reduces the transmembrane gradient, leading to slowed conduction, ECG changes, ventricular arrhythmias, and asystole. Importantly, ECG changes do not always correlate with potassium levels, so treatment decisions should be based on clinical c...

π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š

 π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š in  Patient with AF and acute IS/TIA European Heart Association Guideline recommends: • 1 days after TIA • 3 days after mild stroke • 6 days after moderate stroke • 12 days after severe stroke Early anticoagulation can decrease a risk of recurrent stroke and embolic events but may increase a risk of secondary hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarcts.  The 1-3-6-12-day rule is a known consensus with graded increase in delay of anticoagulation between 1 and 12 days after onset of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA), according to neurological severity based on European expert opinions. However, this rule might be somewhat later than currently used in a real-world practical setting.