Skip to main content

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): diagnosis and management


Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): diagnosis and management

A comprehensive, guideline-oriented clinical review

---

Definition and epidemiology


Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is defined as clinical heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%, evidence of cardiac structural and/or functional abnormalities, and elevated filling pressures at rest or during stress.


HFpEF accounts for ~50% of all heart failure cases and its prevalence continues to rise due to population aging and increasing burden of hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. Mortality remains comparable to HFrEF, with frequent hospitalizations and poor quality of life.



---


Pathophysiology: why HFpEF is complex


HFpEF is not a single disease but a syndrome driven by systemic inflammation and multiorgan dysfunction.


Key mechanisms include:


• Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (impaired relaxation + increased stiffness)

• Concentric remodeling and hypertrophy

• Left atrial dysfunction and elevated filling pressures

• Coronary microvascular dysfunction

• Pulmonary hypertension (post-capillary ± pre-capillary)

• Chronotropic incompetence

• Skeletal muscle and peripheral oxygen utilization abnormalities


Comorbidities such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, CKD, anemia, and sleep apnea play a central pathogenic role rather than being mere associations.



---


Clinical presentation


Symptoms are often nonspecific and exercise-related:


• Exertional dyspnea

• Fatigue and reduced exercise tolerance

• Orthopnea or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea

• Peripheral edema (less prominent than HFrEF)

• Palpitations (often due to atrial fibrillation)


Elderly women with long-standing hypertension and obesity represent the classic phenotype, but HFpEF is increasingly recognized across all demographics.



---


Diagnostic approach to HFpEF


HFpEF diagnosis requires integration of clinical, imaging, and biomarker data.


Step 1: Confirm heart failure syndrome


• Typical symptoms/signs of HF

• Exclude non-cardiac causes of dyspnea


Step 2: Document preserved EF


• LVEF ≥50% on echocardiography


Step 3: Demonstrate elevated filling pressures


This is the cornerstone and most challenging step.



---


Echocardiography in HFpEF


Transthoracic echocardiography is the first-line test.


Key parameters:


Structural criteria

• Left atrial enlargement (LAVI >34 mL/m²)

• LV concentric remodeling or hypertrophy


Functional criteria

• E/e′ ratio (septal ≥15, average ≥13)

• Reduced e′ velocity (septal <7 cm/s, lateral <10 cm/s)

• TR velocity >2.8 m/s

• Pulmonary artery systolic pressure elevation


Diastolic dysfunction grade II or III strongly supports HFpEF.



---


Natriuretic peptides


• BNP ≥35 pg/mL or NT-proBNP ≥125 pg/mL supports diagnosis

• Levels may be falsely low in obesity

• Atrial fibrillation markedly elevates values


Normal natriuretic peptides do not fully exclude HFpEF, especially in obese patients.



---


Scoring systems for diagnosis


H2FPEF score


Components: • Heavy (BMI >30)

• Hypertensive (≥2 antihypertensives)

• Atrial fibrillation

• Pulmonary hypertension

• Elder (age >60)

• Filling pressure (E/e′ >9)


Score ≥6 → high probability of HFpEF


HFA-PEFF algorithm


Developed by the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.


Domains: • Functional

• Morphological

• Biomarkers


Score ≥5 → definite HFpEF

Score 2–4 → indeterminate (requires diastolic stress testing or invasive hemodynamics)



---


Advanced diagnostic testing


Diastolic stress echocardiography


• Exercise E/e′ and TR velocity

• Useful when resting studies are inconclusive


Invasive hemodynamics (gold standard)


• PCWP ≥15 mmHg at rest or ≥25 mmHg with exercise

• Reserved for complex or uncertain cases


Cardiac MRI


• Detects infiltrative diseases (amyloidosis, Fabry)

• Tissue characterization and fibrosis assessment



---


Differential diagnosis to exclude


• Constrictive pericarditis

• Restrictive cardiomyopathy

• High-output heart failure

• Primary pulmonary hypertension

• Valvular heart disease (especially MR and AS)



---


Management of HFpEF: principles


HFpEF management is multifaceted and phenotype-driven.


Core goals: • Reduce congestion

• Improve symptoms and quality of life

• Reduce hospitalizations

• Treat comorbidities aggressively


Unlike HFrEF, no single therapy dramatically reduces mortality; benefit comes from combination and personalization.



---


Disease-modifying pharmacologic therapy


SGLT2 inhibitors (cornerstone therapy)


Empagliflozin and dapagliflozin are recommended for all eligible HFpEF patients regardless of diabetes status.


Benefits: • Reduced HF hospitalizations

• Improved quality of life

• Renal protection


This is the strongest evidence-based therapy in HFpEF.



---


RAAS modulation


• ARBs (candesartan, valsartan): modest reduction in hospitalizations

• ARNI (sacubitril/valsartan): benefit particularly in LVEF 40–57%, women, and recent hospitalization


Blood pressure control remains a key indication.



---


Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists


• Spironolactone may reduce HF hospitalizations

• Careful monitoring of potassium and renal function required



---


Diuretics


• Mainstay for symptom relief

• Loop diuretics for congestion

• No proven mortality benefit, but essential for quality of life



---


Management of comorbidities (critical in HFpEF)


Hypertension

• Strict BP control (<130/80 mmHg)


Atrial fibrillation

• Rhythm control often preferred

• Catheter ablation may improve symptoms

• Anticoagulation per guidelines


Obesity

• Weight loss improves exercise capacity

• GLP-1 receptor agonists show promising data


Diabetes

• SGLT2 inhibitors first-line

• Avoid thiazolidinediones


CKD

• Nephroprotective strategies

• Avoid volume depletion


Sleep apnea

• Screen and treat (CPAP)


Coronary artery disease

• Revascularize when indicated



---


Non-pharmacologic management


• Regular aerobic and resistance exercise

• Sodium restriction (individualized)

• Fluid management education

• Vaccinations

• Multidisciplinary HF programs


Exercise training has one of the strongest effects on functional capacity in HFpEF.



---


Special HFpEF phenotypes


• HFpEF with pulmonary hypertension

• HFpEF with atrial functional MR

• Amyloidosis-related HFpEF

• Elderly frail HFpEF

• Obese-metabolic HFpEF


Future management is moving toward phenotype-specific therapy rather than a single umbrella approach.



---


Prognosis


• Mortality similar to HFrEF

• High rehospitalization rates

• Prognosis driven by comorbidities rather than EF alone


Early diagnosis and comprehensive management significantly improve outcomes.



---


Key take-home points


• HFpEF is a systemic, heterogeneous syndrome

• Diagnosis requires symptoms + preserved EF + elevated filling pressures

• Echocardiography and natriuretic peptides are central tools

• SGLT2 inhibitors are foundational therapy

• Comorbidity management is as important as HF drugs

• Personalized, phenotype-based care is the future


.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brugada ECG vs Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (iRBBB)

Brugada ECG vs Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (iRBBB) Why this differentiation matters Brugada pattern is a malignant channelopathy associated with sudden cardiac death, while incomplete RBBB is usually a benign conduction variant. Mislabeling Brugada as iRBBB can be fatal; overcalling iRBBB as Brugada can lead to unnecessary anxiety and ICD implantation. --- 1. Basic Definitions Brugada ECG Pattern Primary repolarization abnormality Genetic sodium-channel disorder Characteristic ST-segment elevation in V1–V3 Risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden death Incomplete RBBB (iRBBB) Depolarization abnormality Delay in right ventricular conduction Common in healthy individuals Usually asymptomatic and benign --- 2. ECG Morphology: Side-by-Side Comparison QRS Duration Brugada: QRS usually <120 ms iRBBB: QRS <120 ms, but with RBBB morphology --- V1–V2 Pattern (Key Differentiator) Brugada Pseudo-RBBB appearance ST elevation ≥2 mm ST segment is coved or saddleback Terminal QRS bl...

Acute Treatment of Hyperkalemia

Acute Treatment of Hyperkalemia – A Practical, Bedside-Oriented Guide Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening electrolyte abnormality that demands prompt recognition and decisive management. The danger lies not only in the absolute potassium value but in its effects on cardiac conduction, which can rapidly progress to fatal arrhythmias. Acute treatment focuses on three parallel goals: stabilizing the cardiac membrane, shifting potassium into cells, and removing excess potassium from the body. Understanding this stepwise approach helps clinicians act quickly and rationally in emergency settings. Why Hyperkalemia Is Dangerous Potassium plays a key role in maintaining the resting membrane potential of cardiac myocytes. Elevated serum potassium reduces the transmembrane gradient, leading to slowed conduction, ECG changes, ventricular arrhythmias, and asystole. Importantly, ECG changes do not always correlate with potassium levels, so treatment decisions should be based on clinical c...

π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š

 π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š in  Patient with AF and acute IS/TIA European Heart Association Guideline recommends: • 1 days after TIA • 3 days after mild stroke • 6 days after moderate stroke • 12 days after severe stroke Early anticoagulation can decrease a risk of recurrent stroke and embolic events but may increase a risk of secondary hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarcts.  The 1-3-6-12-day rule is a known consensus with graded increase in delay of anticoagulation between 1 and 12 days after onset of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA), according to neurological severity based on European expert opinions. However, this rule might be somewhat later than currently used in a real-world practical setting.