Differentiating LBBB-Pattern SVT From VT Using Initial Forces in Lead V1
Based on the classic Kindwall Criteria (Kindwall et al., Circulation 1988)
Distinguishing supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with left bundle branch block (LBBB) from ventricular tachycardia (VT) is often challenging because both can produce a broad-complex tachycardia with LBBB morphology.
Kindwall and colleagues (1988) published a landmark analysis identifying initial QRS forces in V1 as a powerful discriminator.
This article explains the why and how of these ECG clues.
---
Background: Why V1 Initial Forces Matter
In true LBBB, ventricular activation starts normally in the right ventricle (RV) and then spreads slowly to the left ventricle (LV).
Thus, the initial portion of the QRS reflects rapid septal activation, which remains normal even if the overall QRS is wide.
In contrast, VT originating from the LV produces abnormal early activation, with slow cell-to-cell conduction from the ectopic focus → leading to slurred, delayed, or absent initial forces.
Kindwall et al. exploited this physiology to differentiate SVT with LBBB from VT.
---
Kindwall Criteria (1988): Initial Forces in V1 to Diagnose VT
Kindwall et al. (Circulation, 1988) established three major criteria in lead V1 that strongly favor VT over SVT with LBBB.
All of these examine the first 40 ms of the QRS.
---
1. RS Interval > 60 ms in V1
Measure from QRS onset to the first change of polarity (from R to S).
If > 60 ms → strongly suggests VT.
Rationale: slow initial activation implies myocardial (not His-Purkinje) conduction.
---
2. Initial r Wave > 30 ms in V1
A small initial r should be short and sharp in true LBBB.
If the initial r is broad, slurred, or ≥ 30 ms → favors VT.
Rationale: early activation is slowed by muscle-to-muscle spread.
---
3. Any Notching in the First 40 ms of QRS
Notching, slurring, or an irregular upstroke in the initial 40 ms indicates abnormal initial depolarization.
Presence of notching → consistent with VT.
---
Physiological Logic Behind Kindwall's Criteria
Feature Why It Happens in SVT-LBBB Why It Suggests VT
Fast initial forces Septum and RV activate normally through His-Purkinje Initial activation occurs away from normal system
Sharp r in V1 Normal initial septal activation Delayed, slurred activation from myocardial focus
No early notching His–Purkinje still drives early depolarization Diseased myocardium causes slow, uneven conduction
Thus:
Normal → fast, clean onset.
VT → slow, wide, notched onset.
---
Putting It Together: Practical Interpretation in V1
SVT with LBBB more likely when:
Initial r is thin, sharp, < 30 ms
RS interval < 60 ms
No notching in the initial upstroke
Overall morphology resembles “classical” LBBB pattern
Clinical context: prior LBBB on baseline ECG, young patient without structural heart disease
---
VT more likely when:
Initial r wave in V1 is wide or slurred
Initial notch within 40 ms
RS interval > 60 ms
Dominant initial forces appear slow or broad
Elderly patient, structural heart disease, prior MI
Kindwall found that these criteria were highly specific for VT when any were present.
---
Clinical Utility
These criteria remain useful even today and have influenced modern algorithms (Brugada, Vereckei, ACLS approaches).
They are especially helpful when a tachycardia looks like LBBB but the clinician must decide quickly between adenosine vs amiodarone, or rate-control vs defibrillation pathways.
---
Conclusion
The Kindwall 1988 initial-forces criteria in V1 remain one of the most elegant and physiologically grounded ways to differentiate SVT with LBBB from true VT.
When the initial 40 ms of QRS in V1 is slow, wide, notched, or delayed, VT becomes the overwhelmingly likely diagnosis.

Comments
Post a Comment
Drop your thoughts here, we would love to hear from you