Skip to main content

A cup of coffee a day may cut AF recurrence — the DECAF trial (AHA late-breaking science)

 

Decaf cardiology trial

A cup of coffee a day may cut AF recurrence — the DECAF trial (AHA late-breaking science)

A surprising randomized trial presented as late-breaking science at the American Heart Association’s Scientific Sessions 2025 — and published in JAMA — found that patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were instructed to drink at least one cup of caffeinated coffee daily had fewer recurrences of AF or atrial flutter than those asked to abstain from all caffeine. The finding challenges long-standing advice that people with AF should avoid caffeinated beverages. 


What the DECAF trial did


DECAF (Does Eliminating Coffee Avoid Fibrillation?) was a randomized clinical trial that enrolled about 200 adults who had AF (or atrial flutter) and had recently undergone cardioversion. Participants were randomized 1:1 to (a) consume at least one cup of caffeinated coffee per day for six months or (b) completely abstain from coffee and other sources of caffeine for six months. The trial ran across multiple centers in Australia, the United States and Canada and was designed to test whether avoiding caffeine reduced recurrent arrhythmias. 


Main result


At six months, the primary outcome — recurrence of AF or atrial flutter — occurred in 47% of the coffee group versus 64% of the abstinence group. That translates to a roughly 39% lower hazard of recurrence for the coffee arm (hazard ratio ~0.61; 95% CI approximately 0.42–0.89). The per-protocol analysis (which included participants who adhered to their assigned regimen) suggested an even larger benefit. There were no major differences in serious adverse events between groups. 


Why this is unexpected


For decades many clinicians have advised AF patients to avoid caffeine because caffeine is a stimulant and can acutely increase heart rate and sympathetic activity — mechanisms thought potentially pro-arrhythmic. Observational studies have been mixed, and some prior research suggested no harm from habitual coffee consumption. DECAF is notable because it’s a prospective randomized trial directly testing caffeine exposure in patients with known AF, rather than relying on observational data. 


Possible explanations (hypotheses)


Investigators and commentators have suggested several possible reasons coffee might reduce AF recurrence:


Tolerance: Regular coffee consumers may develop tolerance to caffeine’s stimulatory effects, so low-to-moderate habitual intake may not trigger arrhythmias and could even stabilize autonomic tone over time. 


Non-caffeine compounds: Coffee contains polyphenols and other biologically active compounds (for example, chlorogenic acids) with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects that might reduce arrhythmia susceptibility. 


Reverse causation avoided: Randomization reduces the biases inherent in observational studies where patients who feel symptomatic avoid caffeine — DECAF’s design helps isolate the effect of the exposure. 



These remain hypotheses; the trial was not designed to prove mechanism.


Limitations and cautions


A balanced interpretation is important:


Sample size and population: DECAF enrolled ~200 patients — a respectable size for a randomized behavioral trial but still modest. Participants were people undergoing cardioversion; results may not generalize to all AF patients (for example, those never cardioverted or with different comorbidities). 


Adherence: Not every participant strictly followed the assigned regimen — about 69% adherence in the abstinence group was reported in some summaries — which can bias intention-to-treat estimates. The per-protocol analysis suggested a stronger effect but is more susceptible to selection bias. 


Dose and form: The intervention was “at least one cup of caffeinated coffee daily.” It did not test high doses of caffeine, energy drinks, or differing coffee preparations — so extrapolation beyond a modest daily cup is speculative. 


Short follow-up: The follow-up was six months. Longer-term effects (benefit or harm) remain unknown. 



Clinical implications — what clinicians and patients might take away


DECAF suggests that routine avoidance of modest caffeinated coffee intake after cardioversion may not be necessary and that a daily cup of coffee could be safe — and possibly beneficial — for many patients with AF. Clinicians should:


Avoid blanket restrictions: Rather than universally advising complete caffeine abstinence, clinicians can individualize recommendations — allowing patients who tolerate coffee well to continue it. 


Watch individual response: Some patients do report caffeine-triggered palpitations; patient-level responses still matter. If coffee triggers symptoms in a given patient, avoidance remains reasonable. 


Consider context: The DECAF findings apply to modest daily coffee intake after cardioversion; they do not prove coffee prevents new-onset AF or permit high-dose caffeine consumption. 



Bottom line


The DECAF trial — a randomized study presented at AHA Scientific Sessions 2025 and reported in JAMA — found that consuming at least one cup of caffeinated coffee daily was associated with a significantly lower rate of AF or atrial flutter recurrence over six months compared with complete caffeine abstinence. The finding challenges entrenched advice to avoid coffee after AF and supports individualized, evidence-based counseling. However, confirmatory trials, longer follow-up, and mechanistic studies are needed before changing guideline recommendations broadly. 



---


Key references


1. Caffeinated Coffee Consumption or Abstinence to Reduce Atrial Fibrillation: the DECAF randomized clinical trial. JAMA (DECAF trial publication). 



2. American Heart Association — Scientific Sessions 2025: Late-Breaking Science (DECAF presentation). 



3. AHA Newsroom coverage: “Cup of coffee a day may not be harmful for some adults with AFib — and could lower episodes.” 



4. PubMed / abstract summary of DECAF results. 



5. Nature Medicine coverage summarizing implications and context. 



Thanks.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

STEMI ECG Criteria and Universal Definition of MI

  STEMI ECG Criteria and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction: A Complete Guide for Clinicians Early and accurate diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains the cornerstone of reducing morbidity and mortality in patients presenting with chest pain. Among all forms of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) represents the most time-sensitive emergency, requiring immediate reperfusion therapy. This article provides a clinically relevant summary of the STEMI ECG criteria and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI), based on the latest consensus guidelines from the ESC, ACC, AHA, and WHF. --- 1. Understanding STEMI: Why Accurate ECG Interpretation Matters A 12-lead ECG remains the first and most critical diagnostic test when evaluating suspected myocardial infarction. STEMI is identified when there is evidence of acute coronary artery occlusion, producing transmural ischemia and characteristic ST-segment eleva...

π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š

 π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š in  Patient with AF and acute IS/TIA European Heart Association Guideline recommends: • 1 days after TIA • 3 days after mild stroke • 6 days after moderate stroke • 12 days after severe stroke Early anticoagulation can decrease a risk of recurrent stroke and embolic events but may increase a risk of secondary hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarcts.  The 1-3-6-12-day rule is a known consensus with graded increase in delay of anticoagulation between 1 and 12 days after onset of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA), according to neurological severity based on European expert opinions. However, this rule might be somewhat later than currently used in a real-world practical setting.

2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guidelines Key points

  2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guidelines Explained: A Clear Summary for Clinicians and Students Hypertension remains one of the most significant contributors to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. With continual refinement of evidence and risk-based strategies, the 2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guidelines bring an updated, practical approach that clinicians can use in daily practice. To make learning easier, I’ve created a clean and modern infographic summarizing all major recommendations. You can download it below and use it for study, teaching, or clinical reference. Download Infographic (PNG): 2025 Hypertension Guideline Infographic This post breaks down the key points from the guidelines and complements the infographic for a complete understanding. --- BP Categories: Understanding the Updated Thresholds The guidelines maintain the well-established classification of blood pressure: Normal: <120 / <80 Elevated: 120–129 / <80 Stage 1 Hypertension: 130–139 and/or 8...