Skip to main content

Mitral Fibrous Ring Causing Mitral Stenosis

 Mitral Fibrous Ring Causing Mitral Stenosis


Mitral annular calcification (MAC) or mitral fibrous ring can cause mitral stenosis, particularly in elderly patients. The calcification or fibrosis of the mitral annulus can extend to the leaflets, causing restricted mobility and stenosis.


Causes


- Degenerative changes

- Aging

- Hypertension

- Atherosclerosis

- Chronic kidney disease


Echo Findings


- Mitral annular calcification or fibrosis on 2D echo

- Restricted mobility of the mitral leaflets

- Reduced mitral valve area

- Increased transmitral gradient

- Doppler echo can estimate the mitral valve area and gradient


Severity Assessment


- Mild MAC: small, localized calcification

- Moderate MAC: larger calcification with restricted leaflet mobility

- Severe MAC: extensive calcification with significant leaflet immobility and stenosis


Clinical Implications


- Mitral stenosis can lead to symptoms like dyspnea, fatigue, and palpitations

- Severe MAC can increase the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality

- Echo findings can guide management decisions, including the need for intervention or surgery.


In clinical practice, echocardiography plays a crucial role in diagnosing and assessing the severity of mitral stenosis caused by mitral annular calcification or fibrosis.


Mitral Fibrous Ring vs Bioprosthesis on Echo


Mitral fibrous ring and bioprosthetic valves can be distinguished on echocardiography based on their appearance and functional characteristics.


Mitral Fibrous Ring


- Appears as a thickened, calcified, or fibrotic structure at the mitral annulus

- Restricted mobility of the mitral leaflets

- Reduced mitral valve area

- Increased transmitral gradient

- May have associated mitral regurgitation


Bioprosthetic Valve


- Appears as a distinct, circular or oval structure at the mitral position

- Leaflets are typically thin and mobile

- May have a characteristic "stent" or "frame" appearance

- Normal bioprosthetic valves have a mean gradient < 5 mmHg and a valve area > 1.5 cm2

- May have associated mitral regurgitation, stenosis, or other complications


Key Differences


- Location: Mitral fibrous ring is located at the native mitral annulus, while a bioprosthetic valve is located at the mitral position, replacing the native valve.

- Appearance: Mitral fibrous ring appears as a thickened, calcified, or fibrotic structure, while a bioprosthetic valve has a distinct, circular or oval appearance.

- Mobility: Mitral fibrous ring has restricted mobility, while a bioprosthetic valve has mobile leaflets.


Echo Findings


- 2D echo: Assess the location, size, and mobility of the mitral fibrous ring or bioprosthetic valve.

- Doppler echo: Evaluate the transmitral gradient, valve area, and regurgitation.

- 3D echo: Provide additional information on the valve anatomy and function.


Clinical Implications


- Accurate diagnosis is crucial for guiding management decisions, including the need for intervention or surgery.

- Echo findings can help identify complications, such as mitral regurgitation or stenosis, and monitor the effectiveness of treatment.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Learn Echocardiography | Standard Protocol for Performing Comprehensive Echocardiogram | Explained with Images and Videos

  If you are just starting to learn echocardiography, you will find that learning the full echo examination protocol will be immensely useful. The full protocol will provide a solid foundation for your career in echo. I personally found that once I could execute the standard protocol flawlessly, I was able to add and refine additional echo scanning skills while deepening my understanding of the purpose of each echo image. The echo protocol illustrated in this article is the same one we currently use for all our patients in the hospital and meets or exceeds the standards of American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) for an adult echocardiography examination. The protocol presented here is meant as a guideline and does not cover every aspect (such as off axis views) of an echo examination. Also other hospitals will probably have slight variations of this protocol depending on the lab's needs, which is normal. This article's main purpose is to provide a solid foundation for ...

π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š

 π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š in  Patient with AF and acute IS/TIA European Heart Association Guideline recommends: • 1 days after TIA • 3 days after mild stroke • 6 days after moderate stroke • 12 days after severe stroke Early anticoagulation can decrease a risk of recurrent stroke and embolic events but may increase a risk of secondary hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarcts.  The 1-3-6-12-day rule is a known consensus with graded increase in delay of anticoagulation between 1 and 12 days after onset of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA), according to neurological severity based on European expert opinions. However, this rule might be somewhat later than currently used in a real-world practical setting.

What is Duke treadmill Score (DTS) and How to calculate it?

Watch this simple video on DTS calculation with example case:   Commonly asked questions: How to Calculate Duke treadmill Score? What is DTS? How to risk stratify a patient with ETT (Exercise Tolerance Test)? #Cardiology #Non-Invasive risk Stratification