Skip to main content

Mitral Fibrous Ring Causing Mitral Stenosis

 Mitral Fibrous Ring Causing Mitral Stenosis


Mitral annular calcification (MAC) or mitral fibrous ring can cause mitral stenosis, particularly in elderly patients. The calcification or fibrosis of the mitral annulus can extend to the leaflets, causing restricted mobility and stenosis.


Causes


- Degenerative changes

- Aging

- Hypertension

- Atherosclerosis

- Chronic kidney disease


Echo Findings


- Mitral annular calcification or fibrosis on 2D echo

- Restricted mobility of the mitral leaflets

- Reduced mitral valve area

- Increased transmitral gradient

- Doppler echo can estimate the mitral valve area and gradient


Severity Assessment


- Mild MAC: small, localized calcification

- Moderate MAC: larger calcification with restricted leaflet mobility

- Severe MAC: extensive calcification with significant leaflet immobility and stenosis


Clinical Implications


- Mitral stenosis can lead to symptoms like dyspnea, fatigue, and palpitations

- Severe MAC can increase the risk of cardiovascular events and mortality

- Echo findings can guide management decisions, including the need for intervention or surgery.


In clinical practice, echocardiography plays a crucial role in diagnosing and assessing the severity of mitral stenosis caused by mitral annular calcification or fibrosis.


Mitral Fibrous Ring vs Bioprosthesis on Echo


Mitral fibrous ring and bioprosthetic valves can be distinguished on echocardiography based on their appearance and functional characteristics.


Mitral Fibrous Ring


- Appears as a thickened, calcified, or fibrotic structure at the mitral annulus

- Restricted mobility of the mitral leaflets

- Reduced mitral valve area

- Increased transmitral gradient

- May have associated mitral regurgitation


Bioprosthetic Valve


- Appears as a distinct, circular or oval structure at the mitral position

- Leaflets are typically thin and mobile

- May have a characteristic "stent" or "frame" appearance

- Normal bioprosthetic valves have a mean gradient < 5 mmHg and a valve area > 1.5 cm2

- May have associated mitral regurgitation, stenosis, or other complications


Key Differences


- Location: Mitral fibrous ring is located at the native mitral annulus, while a bioprosthetic valve is located at the mitral position, replacing the native valve.

- Appearance: Mitral fibrous ring appears as a thickened, calcified, or fibrotic structure, while a bioprosthetic valve has a distinct, circular or oval appearance.

- Mobility: Mitral fibrous ring has restricted mobility, while a bioprosthetic valve has mobile leaflets.


Echo Findings


- 2D echo: Assess the location, size, and mobility of the mitral fibrous ring or bioprosthetic valve.

- Doppler echo: Evaluate the transmitral gradient, valve area, and regurgitation.

- 3D echo: Provide additional information on the valve anatomy and function.


Clinical Implications


- Accurate diagnosis is crucial for guiding management decisions, including the need for intervention or surgery.

- Echo findings can help identify complications, such as mitral regurgitation or stenosis, and monitor the effectiveness of treatment.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brugada ECG vs Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (iRBBB)

Brugada ECG vs Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (iRBBB) Why this differentiation matters Brugada pattern is a malignant channelopathy associated with sudden cardiac death, while incomplete RBBB is usually a benign conduction variant. Mislabeling Brugada as iRBBB can be fatal; overcalling iRBBB as Brugada can lead to unnecessary anxiety and ICD implantation. --- 1. Basic Definitions Brugada ECG Pattern Primary repolarization abnormality Genetic sodium-channel disorder Characteristic ST-segment elevation in V1–V3 Risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden death Incomplete RBBB (iRBBB) Depolarization abnormality Delay in right ventricular conduction Common in healthy individuals Usually asymptomatic and benign --- 2. ECG Morphology: Side-by-Side Comparison QRS Duration Brugada: QRS usually <120 ms iRBBB: QRS <120 ms, but with RBBB morphology --- V1–V2 Pattern (Key Differentiator) Brugada Pseudo-RBBB appearance ST elevation ≥2 mm ST segment is coved or saddleback Terminal QRS bl...

Acute Treatment of Hyperkalemia

Acute Treatment of Hyperkalemia – A Practical, Bedside-Oriented Guide Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening electrolyte abnormality that demands prompt recognition and decisive management. The danger lies not only in the absolute potassium value but in its effects on cardiac conduction, which can rapidly progress to fatal arrhythmias. Acute treatment focuses on three parallel goals: stabilizing the cardiac membrane, shifting potassium into cells, and removing excess potassium from the body. Understanding this stepwise approach helps clinicians act quickly and rationally in emergency settings. Why Hyperkalemia Is Dangerous Potassium plays a key role in maintaining the resting membrane potential of cardiac myocytes. Elevated serum potassium reduces the transmembrane gradient, leading to slowed conduction, ECG changes, ventricular arrhythmias, and asystole. Importantly, ECG changes do not always correlate with potassium levels, so treatment decisions should be based on clinical c...

π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š

 π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š in  Patient with AF and acute IS/TIA European Heart Association Guideline recommends: • 1 days after TIA • 3 days after mild stroke • 6 days after moderate stroke • 12 days after severe stroke Early anticoagulation can decrease a risk of recurrent stroke and embolic events but may increase a risk of secondary hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarcts.  The 1-3-6-12-day rule is a known consensus with graded increase in delay of anticoagulation between 1 and 12 days after onset of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA), according to neurological severity based on European expert opinions. However, this rule might be somewhat later than currently used in a real-world practical setting.