Skip to main content

Atrial Flutter Vs Atrial Fibrillation Vs Artifacts - Clear Your ECG Concepts

 

Atrial aflutter vs artefacts on ecg

Can you diagnose what's going on in this ECG strip?

So before I go into a diagnosis can I ask what's the atrial rate and what is the ventricular rate?

Summary: This is just artifact, as you can see V rate doesnt change ,there is no Apc to trigger a reentrant rhythm like flutter,V rate is not a mutiple of 300 which u would expect if atrial rate was truly 300,termination is without any pause or any suggestion of sinus node overdrive

Of All the atrial arrhythmias, 

To differentiate between Atrial fibrillation (AF) and 

Atrial flutter (AFL)

(typical & atypical) are sometimes technically very challenging esp for the non EP , but it’s very important to be able to identify correctly as each of these has a different management strategy, however sometimes even for EP it is not that easy unless EPS is done! 


Reason of such complexity especially in case of flutters is because of the so many types of atypical flutters, with so many ecg morphologies !!


Any general physician and cardiologist will think of Flutter once the characteristic ‘sawtooth’ pattern flutter waves “F” are seen especially in limb leads II, III, and avF !!! 

For an EP speciality there is however much more needed to be done in not only for the correct labelling but especially if any ablation is to be contemplated ! 


The 12 lead Surface ECG as usual have many diagnostic limitations!  

some of the clues /keys to reach to the correct label can still be the following !!!

1. The basic key to understanding and possible correct identification of the arrhythmia in this case is to only focus on the atrial activity/ deflections and not on ventricular (QRS) rate and rhythm. As An irregular V rhythm may be caused by varying degrees of AV nodal block inc Wenckebach cycles. 

2. classic “F” waves (normally representing the typical AFL), They will almost always have a distinct & measurable & reproducible CL & normally will have the same axis hence so often resembling a sawtooth pattern. 

(This “saw tooth's pattern” is most obvious in the inferior limb leads, with a slow downward slope (CTI) followed by a fast upward slope as the current going up septum and then coming onto the inferior leads through the lateral wall .This saw tooth’s pattern is more easily seeable when the ventricular rate response is controlled). 

3. “atypical” F waves (may represent atypical AFL or May still be a variant of typical AFL or even AF!!) These atypical F waves may look quasi regular (which means seeing to be apparently regular however not regular in reality on measurement) especially in lead V1 !! and can dodge the less knowledgable to label it as AFL , though it can still be an AF !!!(phenomena called regional intra-atrial organisation giving rise to this appearance) . 

4. these waves may be of so very low-amplitude or can have so irregularly irregular R to R interval (most common or fav term of non EP Drs !!) and lead to label of AF though both of these patterns may still occur happen in AFL, especially if it’s atypical!!!

5. Pinpointing the flutter waves becomes even more difficult when A to V conduction is 1:1 or 2:1, as the flutter activity is either wholly or partially hidden within the QRS/T. This becomes even more challenging at times when the flutter waves are of very low amplitude. So Whenever making any assessment of Atrial arrhythmia esp flutter it is always important to review the complete 12-lead ECG.

6. These points above explain why the ECG diagnosis of “AF/AFL” is still a biggest dilemma , not only to Jnr Drs, cardio Drs and to even relatively less experienced EP Drs ! 


How to differentiate Right vs left sided sided atrial flutter

The most useful ecg lead to differentiate right from left AFL is chest lead V1.  

1. A broad-based upright V1 is highly suggestive of a left-sided flutter. 

2. when V1 has an initial isoelectric (or inverted) component (followed by an upright component), this is consistent with a right AFL. 

3. Conversely, when V1 is deeply inverted, this is highly suggestive of a right-sided flutter. 

4. And when V1 is biphasic or isoelectric, it is not helpful in predicting the exact chamber

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

STEMI ECG Criteria and Universal Definition of MI

  STEMI ECG Criteria and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction: A Complete Guide for Clinicians Early and accurate diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains the cornerstone of reducing morbidity and mortality in patients presenting with chest pain. Among all forms of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) represents the most time-sensitive emergency, requiring immediate reperfusion therapy. This article provides a clinically relevant summary of the STEMI ECG criteria and the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (UDMI), based on the latest consensus guidelines from the ESC, ACC, AHA, and WHF. --- 1. Understanding STEMI: Why Accurate ECG Interpretation Matters A 12-lead ECG remains the first and most critical diagnostic test when evaluating suspected myocardial infarction. STEMI is identified when there is evidence of acute coronary artery occlusion, producing transmural ischemia and characteristic ST-segment eleva...

π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š

 π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š in  Patient with AF and acute IS/TIA European Heart Association Guideline recommends: • 1 days after TIA • 3 days after mild stroke • 6 days after moderate stroke • 12 days after severe stroke Early anticoagulation can decrease a risk of recurrent stroke and embolic events but may increase a risk of secondary hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarcts.  The 1-3-6-12-day rule is a known consensus with graded increase in delay of anticoagulation between 1 and 12 days after onset of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA), according to neurological severity based on European expert opinions. However, this rule might be somewhat later than currently used in a real-world practical setting.

2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guidelines Key points

  2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guidelines Explained: A Clear Summary for Clinicians and Students Hypertension remains one of the most significant contributors to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality worldwide. With continual refinement of evidence and risk-based strategies, the 2025 AHA/ACC Hypertension Guidelines bring an updated, practical approach that clinicians can use in daily practice. To make learning easier, I’ve created a clean and modern infographic summarizing all major recommendations. You can download it below and use it for study, teaching, or clinical reference. Download Infographic (PNG): 2025 Hypertension Guideline Infographic This post breaks down the key points from the guidelines and complements the infographic for a complete understanding. --- BP Categories: Understanding the Updated Thresholds The guidelines maintain the well-established classification of blood pressure: Normal: <120 / <80 Elevated: 120–129 / <80 Stage 1 Hypertension: 130–139 and/or 8...