Skip to main content

A 76 year old male with cough and wheeze having feeling of skipped beats with this ECG

ECG
 What is the pattern of QRS complexes in rhythm strip of this ecg?

Regular or iregular?
If irregular is it regularly irregular or irregularly irregular?
It can be seen that QRS complexes are clumped into groups, each comprising of three complexes. So its regularly irregular as marked in the following figure:
ECG
Main differential of such a rhythm would be sinus arrhythmia,  Mobitz type II block,  Atrial premature beats, Sinus arrhythmia is unlikely because, in sinus arrhythmia, the rate usually gradually slows and then gradually speeds up.  There is no prolongation of PR interval as in mobitz type II block. Now have a look at p wave morphology of three beats in every group and the compensatory pause after it:

ECG

Are you thinking Atrial Trigeminy?

YES, you nailed it. If we notice the p wave morphology of every third beat its slightly different from the preceding p waves, and also its occurring earlier, compensatory pause after it and then restoration of sinus p wave in next cycle. So these are definitely Atrial Ectopics. Every third beat is atrial premature beat so pattern is Trigeminy.

Atrial Ectopics:

These arise from ectopic pacemaking tissue within the atria. There is an abnormal P wave, usually followed by a normal QRS complex. PACs have the following features:

  • An abnormal (non-sinus) P wave is followed by a QRS complex.
  • The P wave typically has a different morphology and axis to the sinus P waves.
  • The abnormal P wave may be hidden in the preceding T wave, producing a “peaked” or “camel hump” appearance — if this is not appreciated the PAC may be mistaken for a PJC.
  • PACS arising close to the AV node (“low atrial” ectopics) activate the atria retrogradely, producing an inverted P wave with a relatively short PR interval ≥ 120 ms (PR interval < 120 ms is classified as a PJC).
  • PACs that reach the SA node may depolarise it, causing the SA node to “reset” — this results in a longer-than-normal interval before the next sinus beat arrives (“post-extrasystolic pause”). Unlike with PVCs, this pause is not equal to double the preceding RR interval (i.e. not a “full compensatory pause”).
  • PACs arriving early in the cycle may be conducted aberrantly, usually with a RBBB morphology (as the right bundle branch has a longer refractory period than the left). They can be differentiated from PVCs by the presence of a preceding P wave.
  • Similarly, PACs arriving very early in the cycle may not be conducted to the ventricles at all. In this case, you will see an abnormal P wave that is not followed by a QRS complex (“blocked PAC”). It is usually followed by a compensatory pause as the sinus node resets.

Classification:


PACs may be either:

  • Unifocal – Arising from a single ectopic focus; each PAC is identical.
  • Multifocal – Arising from two or more ectopic foci; multiple P-wave morphologies.

Patterns:

PACs often occur in repeating patterns:
  • Bigeminy — every other beat is a PAC.
  • Trigeminy — every third beat is a PAC.
  • Quadrigeminy — every fourth beat is a PAC.
  • Couplet – two consecutive PACs.
  • Triplet — three consecutive PACs.

Clinical Significance:


  • PACs are a normal electrophysiological phenomenon not usually requiring investigation or treatment.
  • Frequent PACs may cause palpitations and a sense of the heart “skipping a beat”.
  • In patients with underlying predispositions (e.g. left atrial enlargement, ischaemic heart disease, WPW), a PAC may be the trigger for the onset of a re-entrant tachydysrhythmia — e.g. AF, flutter, AVNRT, AVRT.

Causes:

Frequent or symptomatic PACs may occur due to:
  • Anxiety.
  • Sympathomimetics.
  • Beta-agonists.
  • Excess caffeine.
  • Hypokalaemia.
  • Hypomagnesaemia.
  • Digoxin toxicity.
  • Myocardial ischaemia

References:

J Electrocardiol. 1978 Apr;11(2):185-9. Concealed atrial bigeminy and trigeminy.Levy MN, Kerin N, Rubenfire M.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brugada ECG vs Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (iRBBB)

Brugada ECG vs Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (iRBBB) Why this differentiation matters Brugada pattern is a malignant channelopathy associated with sudden cardiac death, while incomplete RBBB is usually a benign conduction variant. Mislabeling Brugada as iRBBB can be fatal; overcalling iRBBB as Brugada can lead to unnecessary anxiety and ICD implantation. --- 1. Basic Definitions Brugada ECG Pattern Primary repolarization abnormality Genetic sodium-channel disorder Characteristic ST-segment elevation in V1–V3 Risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden death Incomplete RBBB (iRBBB) Depolarization abnormality Delay in right ventricular conduction Common in healthy individuals Usually asymptomatic and benign --- 2. ECG Morphology: Side-by-Side Comparison QRS Duration Brugada: QRS usually <120 ms iRBBB: QRS <120 ms, but with RBBB morphology --- V1–V2 Pattern (Key Differentiator) Brugada Pseudo-RBBB appearance ST elevation ≥2 mm ST segment is coved or saddleback Terminal QRS bl...

Acute Treatment of Hyperkalemia

Acute Treatment of Hyperkalemia – A Practical, Bedside-Oriented Guide Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening electrolyte abnormality that demands prompt recognition and decisive management. The danger lies not only in the absolute potassium value but in its effects on cardiac conduction, which can rapidly progress to fatal arrhythmias. Acute treatment focuses on three parallel goals: stabilizing the cardiac membrane, shifting potassium into cells, and removing excess potassium from the body. Understanding this stepwise approach helps clinicians act quickly and rationally in emergency settings. Why Hyperkalemia Is Dangerous Potassium plays a key role in maintaining the resting membrane potential of cardiac myocytes. Elevated serum potassium reduces the transmembrane gradient, leading to slowed conduction, ECG changes, ventricular arrhythmias, and asystole. Importantly, ECG changes do not always correlate with potassium levels, so treatment decisions should be based on clinical c...

π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š

 π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š in  Patient with AF and acute IS/TIA European Heart Association Guideline recommends: • 1 days after TIA • 3 days after mild stroke • 6 days after moderate stroke • 12 days after severe stroke Early anticoagulation can decrease a risk of recurrent stroke and embolic events but may increase a risk of secondary hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarcts.  The 1-3-6-12-day rule is a known consensus with graded increase in delay of anticoagulation between 1 and 12 days after onset of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA), according to neurological severity based on European expert opinions. However, this rule might be somewhat later than currently used in a real-world practical setting.