Skip to main content

Intra Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP)

Iabp


🚨 IABP:

πŸ—£️Let’s discuss Intra Aortic BalloonPump (IABP)πŸ©ΊπŸ«€:-


πŸ”΄πŸŒŸ What is IABP?

The IABP is a mechanical circulatory support device that improves coronary perfusion and decreases myocardial workload using counterpulsation.


🧠 Mechanism of Action

⏩ Inflates in diastole → ↑ coronary and end-organ perfusion.

Timing: At the dicrotic notch.

⏩ Deflates in systole → ↓ LV afterload.


Primary Effects:

• ↓ LV Afterload and myocardial oxygen demand.

• ↑ Cardiac output (10-20%).

• ↓ Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP).

• ↑ Coronary perfusion


πŸ”΄ πŸ”‘ When to Use IABP?

πŸš‘ Clinical Indications:


 1️⃣ Acute Mitral Regurgitation (MR): Reduces afterload and regurgitant volume - critical as a bridge to surgery.


2️⃣ Ventricular Septal Rupture (VSR) post-MI: Stabilizes hemodynamics before surgical repair.


3️⃣ Non-AMI Cardiogenic Shock (CS): Especially with high systemic vascular resistance (SVR) (e.g., cold, clammy shock).


4️⃣ Refractory Angina: Palliation of symptoms when medical therapy fails - as a bridge to revascularization (eg LM PCI)


5️⃣ High-Risk (Protected) PCI: Hemodynamic stabilization during complex procedures.


πŸ”΄ πŸ” How to choose between inotropes/vasopressors and IABP?


πŸ’‘ SVR considerations in Cardiogenic Shock (CS):


• High SVR ("cold and clammy" CS): IABP is most effective. ↓ Afterload, improves perfusion by reducing ventricular wall stress.


• Low SVR ("warm and wet" CS): IABP is less effective. These patients benefit more from inotropes or vasopressors to restore vascular tone. (Think patients with mixed shock)


✅ Rule of Thumb:

• High SVR → IABP is preferred.

• Low SVR → Inotropes/vasopressors are first-line.


πŸͺ’ Combined Approach: Often used together in severe cardiogenic shock: IABP ↓ afterload. Inotropes ↑ contractility.


8πŸ”΄ 🚩 Contraindications


❌ Absolute:

• Severe Aortic Insufficiency (AI): Worsens regurgitation (Inflation in diastole pushes blood back into the LV).

• Aortic Dissection: Risk of catastrophic rupture.


⚠️ Relative:

• Severe Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD): Challenges insertion and pre-disposes to limb ischemia.

• Tachycardia (>120-150 bpm): Eg AFib RVR - Results in inadequate augmentation (not enough time for IABP to expand and collapse)

• Sepsis: High risk of complications with limited benefit.


πŸ”΄ πŸ› ️ Troubleshooting common issues


⚠️Watch our for:

• Limb ischemia - monitor distal pulses

• Renal dysfunction - Improper positioning - ⬇️ blood flow to the kidneys

• ↓ Augmentation - consider low SVR state (sepsis)


πŸ”” Waveform abnormalities:

• Flat waveform → Check balloon position (CXR).

• Reduced augmentation → Check helium supply or balloon integrity.


πŸ”§ Alarms:

• Balloon rupture πŸ†˜ → Blood in helium tubing = STOP IABP immediately.

• Trigger failure: Recalibrate ECG or arterial signal.


πŸ”΄ πŸ“š πŸ”‘ Key Trials on IABP


1️⃣ IABP-SHOCK II (2012):

• Population: Cardiogenic shock post-MI.

• Result: No mortality benefit at 30 days with IABP.

• Takeaway: Use selectively in non-AMI CS with high SVR or mechanical complications.


2️⃣ CRISP-AMI (2011):

• Population: STEMI w/o shock.

• Result: No infarct size reduction with IABP.

• Reinforces use in high-risk scenarios only.


3️⃣ Meta-analysis (Post-IABP-SHOCK II):

Benefits in acute MR, VSR, and high SVR shock as a bridge to definitive treatment.


πŸ”΄ 7. Practical tips for IABP management in cardiac ICU


✅ Confirm position daily (CXR).🩻

✅ Reassess timing after BP/HR changes.

✅ Monitor for complications (bleeding, infection, ischemia).

✅ Switch to advanced MCS (e.g., Impella, ECMO) if IABP fails.πŸ©»πŸ‘‡


πŸ”΄ 🎯 8. Takeaways

The IABP is a valuable adjunct in specific scenarios:


 1️⃣ High SVR cardiogenic shock.


 2️⃣ Acute mechanical complications like MR or VSR.


 3️⃣ High-risk PCI.


πŸ’‘ Pro tip: Anticoagulation may not be required with IABP 1:1 augmentation! (Check your institutional policy) 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brugada ECG vs Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (iRBBB)

Brugada ECG vs Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (iRBBB) Why this differentiation matters Brugada pattern is a malignant channelopathy associated with sudden cardiac death, while incomplete RBBB is usually a benign conduction variant. Mislabeling Brugada as iRBBB can be fatal; overcalling iRBBB as Brugada can lead to unnecessary anxiety and ICD implantation. --- 1. Basic Definitions Brugada ECG Pattern Primary repolarization abnormality Genetic sodium-channel disorder Characteristic ST-segment elevation in V1–V3 Risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden death Incomplete RBBB (iRBBB) Depolarization abnormality Delay in right ventricular conduction Common in healthy individuals Usually asymptomatic and benign --- 2. ECG Morphology: Side-by-Side Comparison QRS Duration Brugada: QRS usually <120 ms iRBBB: QRS <120 ms, but with RBBB morphology --- V1–V2 Pattern (Key Differentiator) Brugada Pseudo-RBBB appearance ST elevation ≥2 mm ST segment is coved or saddleback Terminal QRS bl...

Acute Treatment of Hyperkalemia

Acute Treatment of Hyperkalemia – A Practical, Bedside-Oriented Guide Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening electrolyte abnormality that demands prompt recognition and decisive management. The danger lies not only in the absolute potassium value but in its effects on cardiac conduction, which can rapidly progress to fatal arrhythmias. Acute treatment focuses on three parallel goals: stabilizing the cardiac membrane, shifting potassium into cells, and removing excess potassium from the body. Understanding this stepwise approach helps clinicians act quickly and rationally in emergency settings. Why Hyperkalemia Is Dangerous Potassium plays a key role in maintaining the resting membrane potential of cardiac myocytes. Elevated serum potassium reduces the transmembrane gradient, leading to slowed conduction, ECG changes, ventricular arrhythmias, and asystole. Importantly, ECG changes do not always correlate with potassium levels, so treatment decisions should be based on clinical c...

π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š

 π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š in  Patient with AF and acute IS/TIA European Heart Association Guideline recommends: • 1 days after TIA • 3 days after mild stroke • 6 days after moderate stroke • 12 days after severe stroke Early anticoagulation can decrease a risk of recurrent stroke and embolic events but may increase a risk of secondary hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarcts.  The 1-3-6-12-day rule is a known consensus with graded increase in delay of anticoagulation between 1 and 12 days after onset of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA), according to neurological severity based on European expert opinions. However, this rule might be somewhat later than currently used in a real-world practical setting.