Skip to main content

Artefacts on ECG making it difficult to interpret!!!


One of the probably most commonly seen pattern on ecg is the above! 

“A regular & high-frequency "caterpillar" pattern, making it almost difficult to interpret the true underlying electrical activity of the heart!!!”

This is also known as 60 hz or 60 cycle interference on ecg! 

This is Common to areas where the source of electricity is “AC”With frequency of 60 hz !!! There electrical current can leak into other circuits and can results in this pattern on ecg .

To help minimize 60 cycle interference one can set the mode of the 12-lead ECG monitor to 0.05 – 40 Hz!!!!!

Electromagnetic interference (EMI) is defined as unwanted noise / artifacts/ interference in an electrical path or circuit caused by an outside of heart source. 


Most Drs especially the jnr Drs do not have an understanding of the issue or how to resolve the problem and unfortunately accept ECG interference as something like normal !!!!

Fatal arrhythmias may therefore go unnoticed! , and one can be confused or misled to believe that this information is accurate or May even result in unnecessary interventions!!!


The standard ECG machine is designed though to pick up only the electrical activity within the heart but it can pick up any electrical activity from any nearby sources like machinery, Pumps, TV.


In spite of many improvements in the latest patient monitors & ECG machines, but EMI has been a problem for last so many decades! and unfortunately continues to be an issue

Even today. 


EMI artifacts usually results from the foll sources!!!

A. Electrical equipment like 

Power lines 

electrical wires in walls/ceilings, any other electrical devices 
B.Mobile phones

Cell phones, especially when activated and near the ECG machine, can produce EMI. 
C.Wireless devices 

Wireless local area networks (WLAN) 

other wireless technologies
D.Medical equipment

intravenous infusion pumps dialysis machines

E. Poor grounding: 

Inadequate grounding can always allow stray currents to enter the circuit, resulting in noise and further artifacts. 



Several Methods to reduce/minimise/eradicate EMI !!!


A. Better use of Filters! 

All ECG machines have filters (like high-pass, low-pass, and notch filters) to eradicate the unwanted frequencies and improve signal the clarity. 

If the low frequency / high pass filter (the lowest number) is set to 0.05 Hz one may be able to get near clean ST-segments !!!

B. Devices removal: 

Turning off or removing devices causing EMI, such as cell phones, can help. 
making sure to keep ECG machines and patients away from sources of EMI! 
C. Signal conditioning

Signal conditioning techniques can help remove noise and improve ECG signal quality. 

If possible, running the recording equipment off batteries to avoid picking up line noise.


Thanks


Visit our ECG Library for ECG Cases


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Brugada ECG vs Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (iRBBB)

Brugada ECG vs Incomplete Right Bundle Branch Block (iRBBB) Why this differentiation matters Brugada pattern is a malignant channelopathy associated with sudden cardiac death, while incomplete RBBB is usually a benign conduction variant. Mislabeling Brugada as iRBBB can be fatal; overcalling iRBBB as Brugada can lead to unnecessary anxiety and ICD implantation. --- 1. Basic Definitions Brugada ECG Pattern Primary repolarization abnormality Genetic sodium-channel disorder Characteristic ST-segment elevation in V1–V3 Risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden death Incomplete RBBB (iRBBB) Depolarization abnormality Delay in right ventricular conduction Common in healthy individuals Usually asymptomatic and benign --- 2. ECG Morphology: Side-by-Side Comparison QRS Duration Brugada: QRS usually <120 ms iRBBB: QRS <120 ms, but with RBBB morphology --- V1–V2 Pattern (Key Differentiator) Brugada Pseudo-RBBB appearance ST elevation ≥2 mm ST segment is coved or saddleback Terminal QRS bl...

π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š

 π˜Όπ™£π™©π™žπ™˜π™€π™–π™œπ™ͺπ™‘π™–π™©π™žπ™€π™£ π˜Όπ™›π™©π™šπ™§ π™Žπ™©π™§π™€π™ π™š in  Patient with AF and acute IS/TIA European Heart Association Guideline recommends: • 1 days after TIA • 3 days after mild stroke • 6 days after moderate stroke • 12 days after severe stroke Early anticoagulation can decrease a risk of recurrent stroke and embolic events but may increase a risk of secondary hemorrhagic transformation of brain infarcts.  The 1-3-6-12-day rule is a known consensus with graded increase in delay of anticoagulation between 1 and 12 days after onset of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack(TIA), according to neurological severity based on European expert opinions. However, this rule might be somewhat later than currently used in a real-world practical setting.

Acute Treatment of Hyperkalemia

Acute Treatment of Hyperkalemia – A Practical, Bedside-Oriented Guide Hyperkalemia is a potentially life-threatening electrolyte abnormality that demands prompt recognition and decisive management. The danger lies not only in the absolute potassium value but in its effects on cardiac conduction, which can rapidly progress to fatal arrhythmias. Acute treatment focuses on three parallel goals: stabilizing the cardiac membrane, shifting potassium into cells, and removing excess potassium from the body. Understanding this stepwise approach helps clinicians act quickly and rationally in emergency settings. Why Hyperkalemia Is Dangerous Potassium plays a key role in maintaining the resting membrane potential of cardiac myocytes. Elevated serum potassium reduces the transmembrane gradient, leading to slowed conduction, ECG changes, ventricular arrhythmias, and asystole. Importantly, ECG changes do not always correlate with potassium levels, so treatment decisions should be based on clinical c...